Fix plan approval gate and add "Create a plan:" prefix for first message
- Fix build warnings: add #[allow(dead_code)] to unused deserialization fields - Fix plan approval gate bug: block file changes when no plan exists (not just when plan exists but is unapproved) - Add "Create a plan: " prefix to first user message in plan mode - Add prepare_plan_mode_input() helper function for testability - Reset is_first_plan_message flag when entering plan mode via /plan command - Add tests for approval gate (no plan + no changes, no plan + changes) - Add tests for prepare_plan_mode_input (happy, negative, boundary cases)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -52,6 +52,18 @@ pub fn build_prompt(in_multiline: bool, in_plan_mode: bool, agent_name: Option<&
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Prepare user input for plan mode, prepending "Create a plan: " if this is the first message.
|
||||
/// Returns the (possibly modified) input and whether the flag should be reset.
|
||||
pub fn prepare_plan_mode_input(input: &str, is_first_plan_message: bool, in_plan_mode: bool) -> (String, bool) {
|
||||
if in_plan_mode && is_first_plan_message {
|
||||
// Prepend "Create a plan: " and signal to reset the flag
|
||||
(format!("Create a plan: {}", input), true)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// No modification needed
|
||||
(input.to_string(), false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check if the input is an approval command (for plan mode).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Recognizes: "a", "approve", "approved", and common misspellings.
|
||||
@@ -191,6 +203,9 @@ pub async fn run_interactive<W: UiWriter>(
|
||||
// Track plan mode state (start in plan mode for non-agent mode)
|
||||
let mut in_plan_mode = !from_agent_mode;
|
||||
|
||||
// Track if this is the first message in plan mode (to prepend "Create a plan: ")
|
||||
let mut is_first_plan_message = in_plan_mode;
|
||||
|
||||
// Sync agent's plan mode state with CLI state
|
||||
agent.set_plan_mode(in_plan_mode);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -275,8 +290,13 @@ pub async fn run_interactive<W: UiWriter>(
|
||||
// Reprint input with formatting
|
||||
reprint_formatted_input(&input, &prompt);
|
||||
|
||||
// Prepend "Create a plan: " for first message in plan mode
|
||||
let (final_input, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input(&input, is_first_plan_message, in_plan_mode);
|
||||
if should_reset {
|
||||
is_first_plan_message = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
execute_user_input(
|
||||
&mut agent, &input, show_prompt, show_code, &output, from_agent_mode
|
||||
&mut agent, &final_input, show_prompt, show_code, &output, from_agent_mode
|
||||
).await;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Single line input
|
||||
@@ -328,6 +348,7 @@ pub async fn run_interactive<W: UiWriter>(
|
||||
CommandResult::EnterPlanMode => {
|
||||
in_plan_mode = true;
|
||||
agent.set_plan_mode(true);
|
||||
is_first_plan_message = true;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -336,8 +357,13 @@ pub async fn run_interactive<W: UiWriter>(
|
||||
// Reprint input with formatting
|
||||
reprint_formatted_input(&input, &prompt);
|
||||
|
||||
// Prepend "Create a plan: " for first message in plan mode
|
||||
let (final_input, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input(&input, is_first_plan_message, in_plan_mode);
|
||||
if should_reset {
|
||||
is_first_plan_message = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
execute_user_input(
|
||||
&mut agent, &input, show_prompt, show_code, &output, from_agent_mode
|
||||
&mut agent, &final_input, show_prompt, show_code, &output, from_agent_mode
|
||||
).await;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -529,5 +555,65 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(is_approval_input("yes!"));
|
||||
assert!(is_approval_input("ok,"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests for prepare_plan_mode_input
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_happy_path_first_message() {
|
||||
// Happy path: First message in plan mode gets "Create a plan: " prefix
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input("fix the bug", true, true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "Create a plan: fix the bug");
|
||||
assert!(should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_negative_second_message() {
|
||||
// Negative: Second message (is_first_plan_message = false) should NOT get prefix
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input("fix the bug", false, true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "fix the bug");
|
||||
assert!(!should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_negative_not_in_plan_mode() {
|
||||
// Negative: Not in plan mode should NOT get prefix even if is_first_plan_message is true
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input("fix the bug", true, false);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "fix the bug");
|
||||
assert!(!should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_negative_neither_condition() {
|
||||
// Negative: Neither in plan mode nor first message
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input("fix the bug", false, false);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "fix the bug");
|
||||
assert!(!should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_boundary_empty_input() {
|
||||
// Boundary: Empty input would get prefix, but in practice empty input
|
||||
// is filtered out by the caller before reaching this function.
|
||||
// This test documents the function's behavior in isolation.
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input("", true, true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "Create a plan: ");
|
||||
assert!(should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_boundary_whitespace_input() {
|
||||
// Boundary: Whitespace-only input gets prefix preserved
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input(" ", true, true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "Create a plan: ");
|
||||
assert!(should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_prepare_plan_mode_input_boundary_multiline_input() {
|
||||
// Boundary: Multiline input gets prefix on first line only
|
||||
let (result, should_reset) = prepare_plan_mode_input("line1\nline2\nline3", true, true);
|
||||
assert_eq!(result, "Create a plan: line1\nline2\nline3");
|
||||
assert!(should_reset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -716,6 +716,7 @@ impl UiWriter for ConsoleUiWriter {
|
||||
#[derive(serde::Deserialize)]
|
||||
struct PlanCompact {
|
||||
plan_id: String,
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
revision: u32,
|
||||
approved_revision: Option<u32>,
|
||||
items: Vec<PlanItemCompact>,
|
||||
@@ -731,6 +732,7 @@ impl UiWriter for ConsoleUiWriter {
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
evidence: Vec<String>,
|
||||
#[serde(default)]
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
notes: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
#[derive(serde::Deserialize)]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1010,8 +1010,34 @@ pub fn check_plan_approval_gate(session_id: &str, working_dir: Option<&str>) ->
|
||||
// Check if a plan exists and whether it's approved
|
||||
let plan = match read_plan(session_id) {
|
||||
Ok(Some(plan)) => plan,
|
||||
Ok(None) => return ApprovalGateResult::Allowed, // No plan, allow
|
||||
Err(_) => return ApprovalGateResult::Allowed, // Can't read plan, allow
|
||||
Ok(None) => {
|
||||
// No plan exists - check if there are file changes that need blocking
|
||||
let status_output = std::process::Command::new("git")
|
||||
.args(["status", "--porcelain"])
|
||||
.current_dir(dir)
|
||||
.output();
|
||||
|
||||
let output = match status_output {
|
||||
Ok(o) if o.status.success() => String::from_utf8_lossy(&o.stdout).to_string(),
|
||||
_ => return ApprovalGateResult::Allowed,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if output.trim().is_empty() {
|
||||
return ApprovalGateResult::Allowed; // No changes, allow
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// There are file changes but no plan - block and require plan creation
|
||||
return ApprovalGateResult::Blocked {
|
||||
message: "⚠️ IMPLEMENTATION BLOCKED\n\n\
|
||||
You attempted to modify files without creating a plan first.\n\n\
|
||||
Before implementing, you must:\n\
|
||||
1. Create a plan with `plan_write`\n\
|
||||
2. Get the plan approved by the user\n\n\
|
||||
Do not attempt to implement until the plan is approved.".to_string(),
|
||||
reverted_files: vec![],
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(_) => return ApprovalGateResult::Allowed, // Can't read plan, allow (error case)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if plan.is_approved() {
|
||||
@@ -1424,12 +1450,40 @@ items: []
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_approval_gate_no_plan() {
|
||||
// With a non-existent session, there's no plan, so it should allow
|
||||
let result = check_plan_approval_gate("nonexistent-session-xyz", Some("."));
|
||||
fn test_approval_gate_no_plan_no_changes() {
|
||||
// With a non-existent session and no uncommitted changes, it should allow.
|
||||
// We use a temp dir that's a fresh git repo with no changes.
|
||||
let temp_dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap();
|
||||
std::process::Command::new("git")
|
||||
.args(["init"])
|
||||
.current_dir(temp_dir.path())
|
||||
.output()
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
let result = check_plan_approval_gate("nonexistent-session-xyz", Some(temp_dir.path().to_str().unwrap()));
|
||||
assert!(matches!(result, ApprovalGateResult::Allowed));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_approval_gate_no_plan_with_changes() {
|
||||
// With a non-existent session but uncommitted changes, it should block.
|
||||
let temp_dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap();
|
||||
std::process::Command::new("git")
|
||||
.args(["init"])
|
||||
.current_dir(temp_dir.path())
|
||||
.output()
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
// Create an untracked file to simulate changes
|
||||
std::fs::write(temp_dir.path().join("new_file.txt"), "test content").unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let result = check_plan_approval_gate("nonexistent-session-xyz", Some(temp_dir.path().to_str().unwrap()));
|
||||
assert!(matches!(result, ApprovalGateResult::Blocked { .. }));
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify the blocking message mentions creating a plan
|
||||
if let ApprovalGateResult::Blocked { message, .. } = result {
|
||||
assert!(message.contains("plan_write"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_approval_gate_not_git_repo() {
|
||||
// /tmp is typically not a git repo
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user