# Strongly Connected Components Analysis

## Summary

**No cycles detected in the crate-level dependency graph.**

The G3 workspace exhibits a clean DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) structure at the crate level.

## Analysis Method

Cycle detection performed via manual topological sort verification of the 16 internal dependency edges.

## Topological Order (Valid)

The following topological ordering confirms acyclicity:

1. g3-config (leaf)
2. g3-execution (leaf)
3. g3-computer-control (leaf)
4. g3-providers (leaf)
5. g3-core (depends on 1-4)
6. g3-ensembles (depends on 1, 5)
7. g3-planner (depends on 1, 4, 5)
8. g3-cli (depends on 1, 4, 5, 6, 7)
9. g3 (depends on 4, 8)
10. g3-console (standalone)

## Potential Coupling Concerns

While no cycles exist, the following patterns warrant attention:

### Diamond Dependencies

```
g3-cli ──────────────────────────────┐
   │                                  │
   ├── g3-core ── g3-config ◄─────────┤
   │                                  │
   ├── g3-planner ── g3-config ◄──────┤
   │                                  │
   └── g3-ensembles ── g3-config ◄────┘
```

`g3-config` is reached via multiple paths from `g3-cli`. This is not a cycle but indicates `g3-config` is a shared foundation.

### Similar Diamond for g3-core

```
g3-cli ──────────────────────────────┐
   │                                  │
   ├── g3-core ◄──────────────────────┤
   │                                  │
   ├── g3-planner ── g3-core ◄────────┤
   │                                  │
   └── g3-ensembles ── g3-core ◄──────┘
```

## Module-Level Analysis

Module-level cycle detection was not performed. The `use crate::` statements within each crate suggest internal module dependencies but these are expected within a single compilation unit.

## Conclusion

The crate dependency structure is healthy with no circular dependencies.