chore(agents): point Matt Pocock skills at the beads issue tracker
CI / check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / check (push) Has been cancelled
The engineering skills (to-tickets, triage, spec, wayfinder) need to know where issues live for this repo. It is not the Gitea forge remote; it is bd/beads, which AGENTS.md already mandates for all task tracking. Adds docs/agents/issue-tracker.md (bd commands and wayfinding mapping), docs/agents/triage-labels.md (five canonical roles kept as-is, applied with bd tag / bd label add), docs/agents/domain.md (single-context layout: CONTEXT.md plus docs/adr/ at the root), and an 'Agent skills' index block in AGENTS.md. The pre-existing staged deletion of CLAUDE.md is left out of this commit and stays in the index.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
# Domain Docs
|
||||
|
||||
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
## Before exploring, read these
|
||||
|
||||
- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root, or
|
||||
- **`CONTEXT-MAP.md`** at the repo root if it exists — it points at one `CONTEXT.md` per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
|
||||
- **`docs/adr/`** — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check `src/<context>/docs/adr/` for context-scoped decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The `/domain-modeling` skill (reached via `/grill-with-docs` and `/improve-codebase-architecture`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
## File structure
|
||||
|
||||
Single-context repo (most repos):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/
|
||||
├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
├── docs/adr/
|
||||
│ ├── 0001-two-overlay-strategies.md
|
||||
│ └── 0002-package-discovery-via-git-index.md
|
||||
├── packages/
|
||||
├── overlays/
|
||||
└── modules/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This repo uses the single-context layout. There is no `CONTEXT-MAP.md` and no per-directory `CONTEXT.md` files; the whole overlay is one domain.
|
||||
|
||||
Multi-context repo (presence of `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the root):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/
|
||||
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
|
||||
├── docs/adr/ ← system-wide decisions
|
||||
└── src/
|
||||
├── ordering/
|
||||
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
│ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
|
||||
└── billing/
|
||||
├── CONTEXT.md
|
||||
└── docs/adr/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Use the glossary's vocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
|
||||
|
||||
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Flag ADR conflicts
|
||||
|
||||
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
|
||||
|
||||
> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user